LASU defended its decision on multiple choice only questions.
All that is required of part-time students at the Lagos State
University, LASU, is to answer a set of 70 multiple choice questions
every semester to be awarded a Bachelors degree, PREMIUM TIMES has
learnt.
In what one university professor described as a “dangerous
development” in the already poor standard of university education in the
country, LASU earlier this year directed all lecturers at its part-time
campuses scattered across Lagos to henceforth set only multiple choice
questions for all examinations.
Copies of some questions seen by this newspaper suggest that the
questions were haphazardly put together with irregular numbering, ridden
with grammatical and sometimes factual errors. It is devoid of the
standardised quality associated with public multiple-choice
examinations.
There seems to be no effort made by the university to control and
manage the standard. Invigilation during the examination was lax, if any
at all, we learnt. Examination halls were so crowded that some students
did their examination standing in many of the campuses.
Although results were released in record time, there were several cases of missing results.
Al-Amin Alli-Balogun, the President of the Students’ Representative
Council, SRC, said many results were posted in the wrong campuses. After
several days of searching, some students at the Agege campus saw their
results posted at Festac campus. Rather than being an exception, it was
the norm across all campuses, he said.
“The MCQ [multiple-choice questions] have been able to curb the issue
of no results, missing results and the excesses of lecturers,” he
admitted.
However, he described the introduction of multiple choice questions
only as a “disgusting moment” in the history of the programme. He said
the school management only introduced it to deceive students that
something is being done to correct the anomalies of the programme.
“We don’t have qualified lecturers; the LASU management is only doing
this to deceive the students that the programme is changing while it is
actually decaying the more. Mass failure is still an issue. Students
don’t have proper records of the examination they have taken before or
the one they should be taking next,” he said.
One student at the Anthony campus described the quality of the
printing papers the questions were printed on as similar to what one
sees during secondary school mock examinations.
The examinations were so substandard that some enterprising students
kicked against the development to the point of openly protesting against
it to lecturers, PREMIUM TIMES was told.
A former student leader of the programme, Julius Adeoye, highlighted other problems with the examination:
“The literature department, for instance, write exams based on the
books they’ve read. We have different lectures with different books
recommended but are required to answer the exact same questions. How do
you expect students at the Jibowu campus, for instance, to answer
questions on a text that wasn’t recommended to them but was recommended
to students at the Festac campus?
“Writing OMR will not even allow the students to grow because I can
easily copy and paste but if I’m required to write theory [essay type
questions] there is no way I can copy everything from another student.
Students don’t even attend classes anymore they just show up for
examination knowing they can easily copy the answers of other students,”
he added.
But LASU management said its adoption of the multiple choice
questions only for part-time student was the best solution to the horde
of problems bedevilling the programme.
“For those who know how to develop the content, multiple choice is a
better assessment than theory,” said an aide to the university’s
Director of External System, Dayo Akinshola.
“Multiple choice is not an innovation in Nigeria. As far back as the
1970s multiple choice has been in existence. If anybody is against it,
it is one of three reasons: one, the person is lazy and doesn’t know how
to set the questions. Secondly, the person doesn’t want to relinquish
his power of oppression because with multiple choice questions you’re
not going to have contacts with the students again and thirdly for
whatever reasons, the person wants to frustrate certain people and he
knows with multiple that will not be possible. The benefits are endless
so whoever doesn’t understand the concept must belong to one of those
three categories,” Mr. Akinsola, who said he has over 20 years
experience as an academic, said.
He said lecturers who criticise the introduction of the multiple
choice questions are bitter because the university has effectively
plugged their means of extorting students. He also denied that the
examinations were conducted in overcrowded rooms. He challenged any
student with proof to present it.
However, prominent academics in the country disagree with Mr.
Akinsola on the superiority of the multiple choice questions as a means
of assessment.
Despite their ability to cover wide areas of the subject matter,
multiple choice questions fall short of assessing the skills that make a
“total graduate,” said Oyewusi Ibidapo-Obe, a former Vice-Chancellor of
the University of Lagos, UNILAG.
“It is not sufficient. It falls short of examining all the aspects
that are very critical to the making of a graduate. When people finish
they will be faced with actually writing up opinions in a very
legitimate literate version. So we need to teach them the concept of
composition; of writing,” Mr. Ibidapo-Obe, a Professor of Applied
Mathematics and Engineering Systems, said.
“I think it is a dangerous development as it may not be able to fully
assess a student’s performance,” said Professor Akii Ibhadode of the
University of Benin, UNIBEN.
He advised that a mixture of multiple choice questions and essay type
questions can be useful up to the second year level but not further
than that.
The National University Commission, NUC, spokesperson, Ibrahim
Yakassai, said universities have been directed to desist from setting
entirely multiple choice questions. He promised that the commission
would investigate and stop LASU from continuing with the practice.
Theses for sale
The LASU part-time programme is a thriving auction for the sale of results and theses, PREMIUM TIMES can reveal.
The sale of theses, we discovered, are so widespread that lecturers
now brazenly ask students to pay into their bank accounts and present
copies of tellers as proof of payment. Students are required to pay as
much as N50,000 before their proposals are supervised or up to N150,000
to have one written for them by the lecturers themselves.
Female students are given considerable discounts if they agree to sleep with lecturers.
A student, who asked not to be named, at the Jibowu campus said he
knows lecturers who merely give part-time students theses written by
full-time students and ask them to be reprinted with the names of
part-time students.
Another student at the Festac campus said he paid because everyone else was paying.
“You don’t expect morality from where immorality looms. When
lecturers are not paid you don’t expect them to behave professionally.
Imagine LASU just paid lecturers three days ago [October 30] for
salaries that have been due for over two years. How do you expect them
to survive if they don’t engage in immoralities and misconducts,” said
Mr. Alli-Balogun.
Mr. Akinshola said any lecturer who indulges in malpractices under
the pretext of owed honorarium is just being dishonest. He said
lecturers are paid on time. He explained that the only lecturers who
were not paid were those from the School of Communication because they
were ripping the university management off.
“The only honorarium that was delayed and paid two days ago was the
one for the School of Communication. They are the people saying all
these kinds of rubbish. We know their antecedent. We know their stock in
trade. We are not going to bleed our eyes over 1400 students when we
have 50,000 students elsewhere. These are people who see it as a means
of enriching themselves. They are busy inflating the amount they want to
collect and the university management in its own wisdom said no.
“The issue was investigated by the director and at the end of the day
it was discovered that the university has been thoroughly ripped off.
They were forced to revert to the norm and once they complied they were
paid. That money was processed within two months. If they had complied
two years ago they would have been paid their money. They were asking to
be paid the money that they never had.” The spokesperson said.
He said the school management has already come up with plans to stop
extortions of students by lecturers but declined to say what these plans
are. He said any student who pays for his or her theses to be
supervised or written is doing so at his or her own risk.
An image tarnishing programme
The disorderliness of the examinations and in fact the entire part
time programme indicates that the university management is doing
everything to rid itself of a programme with a long history of
malpractices as quickly as possible.
Following report of widespread malpractices soon after the part-time
programmes were relocated from the university’s main campus in Ojo into
poorly equipped campuses across the state, things spiralled out of
control.
The programme was over taken by a hostage mentality. The university
management, lured by the high fees paid by the students, admitted more
students than it could handle. Because regular lecturers couldn’t cope
with the rigour of teaching regular students as well as part time
students, the university management resorted to employing part-time
lecturers, many of whom are secondary school teachers without any
experience in teaching at the tertiary level. Worse, they were not
properly monitored or mentored as one would have expected. They were
left to their own devices.
Frustrated by delayed payment of honoraria, many of these part-time
lecturers resorted to brazen-faced extortion of students. Results were
withheld for close to two years by some lecturers. For instance, results
of some English Language examinations written in June 2012 were
released in October 2013. Saddened by rampant malpractices, many
full-time lecturers washed their hands off the programme.
Worried that incessant scandals associated with the part-time
programme was going to irreparably tarnish the university’s reputation,
in 2011, the State government scraped programme. The university
management was directed to stop admitting new students. The last of the
current students are expected to graduate in 2016 when the programme
would be finally rested.
No comments:
Post a Comment